Davos, Switzerland
18 July 2018
Solo
Scree, a tough ridge scramble, and more scree
I had some unfinished business to deal with on Hoch Ducan (also known as Piz Ducan). Last year, in September 2017, I made an unsuccessful attempt when I left the trail in the Ducan Valley too early and ended up getting stuck in the sharp, steep cliffs on the mountain’s north side. With the weather turning that day, I decided to abort and simply head back into town for a nice cold beer instead – a good idea at the time.
Now it was time to return and complete the mission. With more detailed information in hand, I hiked from the small hamlet of Sand in the Sertig Valley almost to the end of the Ducan Valley this time, then turned left to gain the huge talus slope that comes off the main ridge between Chlein Ducan and Hoch Ducan. It was a tedious slog, but made access to the ridge top pretty easy.
There is a faint trail on the southwest ridge of Hoch Ducan that leads to the first crux, a short, slightly exposed inclined rock face with a steep gully below and a narrow ledge to tiptoe across. The rest was a moderate scramble to the lonely summit, which doesn’t appear to see too many visitors according to the few entries every year in the register. I’d think that the long, unattractive scree slog probably keeps the masses away.
As one of the highest points in the Albula Range the Hoch Ducan offers sweeping views over the surrounding valleys and peaks. You can look down the whole length of both the Ducan Valley and Sertig Valley, while the Älplihorn (3006 m) features prominently behind. Bigger objectives such as Piz Kesch and Piz Ela also show up nicely on the horizon. Further along the ridge to the NE sits the imposing Plattenflue with its characteristic arrangement of stacked layers steeply dipping to the south. I had noted the Plattenflue as a possible second objective for the day, but now looking at its steep and jagged access ridge, I was less sure about it.
My Plattenflue idea completely evaporated on the descent down Hoch Ducan’s exasperating NE ridge. I only had a very vague description of the route from the SAC Guidebook, which was both confusing and contradictory in parts. In general, the proper route basically follows the ridge crest, with several downclimbs on either the left or the right side whenever a vertical drop-off is encountered on the crest. However, it is exactly on the question of whether to go right or left where the confusion is.
Right after leaving the summit a steep downclimb needs to be overcome on the left (NW) side of the ridge down a muddy couloir, but it is full of loose, crumbly rock and poor holds. Rockfall is definitely a huge risk here and I’m really glad I was alone, not crashing any rocks on people below me. Once I was back on the ridge I soon ran into the next cliff, which I tried to bypass on the left again – wrong move! After losing some 40 to 50 metres on the exposed and crumbly NW face, the terrain started getting dangerously steep, with no way around the cliff on the ridge crest. I had no choice but to climb back up and try my luck on the other (SE) side of the ridge, which consists of a series of downsloping slabs interrupted by step-like cliffbands. The name of the game now was to zig-zag along these slabs up and down, trying to find a break in the cliffbands that could be scrambled down, then hop onto the next slab to find a crack or ramp down the next cliff and so on… The tricky part was that the slabs tend to steepen the further away from the ridge you get, while closer to the ridge crest they tend to narrow and sometimes peter out. A searching game, thus, and an unnerving one since the whole time I wasn’t even sure whether I was on the right track or whether I might have to climb all the way back up to the summit again.
It took a long time but eventually I found my way down and back to the ridge crest, albeit not without several challenging scrambles. A few more tricky downclimbs on the pointy crest followed to get down to a couloir that bypasses the last bit of exposed ridge immediately before a small col.
By now I was pretty exhausted and simply didn’t have the strength of mind anymore to tackle crazy Plattenflue, especially since I was solo. I was just glad I had made it down to the col which permits a relatively easy way down the NW slopes back into the Ducan Valley. Before heading down, there was one last minor objective – a small peak between Hoch Ducan and Plattenflue called Gotama. A consolation prize, so to speak. It’s a short moderate scramble on steep slabs, a mere 5-10 minutes from the col to the shiny summit cross containing a beautifully adorned book. I’m not sure why this little sub-peak deserves its own name and register, after all it’s only about 50 m higher than the col. Yet some people seem to come up here just for this one summit from the more gentle south slopes as is evident from the register.
I enjoyed my last summit break staring at the impossibly steep SW ridge of Plattenflue, then headed down scree, snow and more scree from the col back into the Ducan Valley. After all the scree that had shaken my knees today and the very challenging traverse of Hoch Ducan, I was certainly glad to be back on the valley trail and thoroughly enjoyed the walk back to the restaurant at Sand.
Note: If doing the full traverse, I’d highly recommend doing it the other way round (i.e. in a clockwise direction). This way, tackling the tricky NE ridge of Hoch Ducan is done on the ascent, which is probably slightly easier than descending it. A helmet is a must.
Elevation: | 3063 m (official), 3061 m (my GPS) |
Elevation gain: | 1370 m |
Time: | 9.0 h |
Distance: | 12.9 km |
Difficulty level: | Normal route (SW ridge): Moderate (Kane), T4 (SAC) |
NE ridge: Difficult climber’s scramble (Kane), T6 (SAC) | |
Reference: | Local maps |
Comments: | Rockfall danger on NE ridge – helmet highly advisable! |
Personal rating: | 2 (out of 5) |
DISCLAIMER: Use at your own risk for general guidance only! Do not follow this GPX track blindly but use your own judgement in assessing terrain and choosing the safest route.